deleted by creator

(your codeberg link is broken)

you can also donate or become a paying member

he opted not to use AI …

the best git command

The title points out the problem. It DOESN’T MATTER what he intended; we already know his views. What matters is the message it sent to far-right supporters across the globe. He never made an attempt to address that.

I don’t have a view on this particular case, but “calling it out” whilst still functioning effectively as normal is essentially a strongly-worded letter. F, and I can’t stress this enough, that. Protest cannot be subdued by convenience.

I feel we disagree on a number of fundamental things. We’re not going to get anywhere on a site like this

You mention lots of options. Given people are varied, and you want that in a company, how about letting the candidate decide how to prove themselves? It’s pretty established that it’s not “fair” to stick to a single style, so why hang on to that?

I meant judging people for feeling anxious, as opposed to judging aptitude.

for those who this affects, this lands badly

deleted by creator

Stress is not something you can reason about in the way you imply. It’s an emotional response, and people vary wildly in how they will react. It’s great to hear you don’t get stressed, but judging people who do is, well, concerning.

Live coding in interviews is a completely different experience to pair programming, night and day. I don’t ever recall being asked to code in front of a group.

The article isn’t saying don’t check, it’s saying that live coding interviews are a bad measure.

You seem to be disagreeing with something that isn’t the main point of the article.

That you take those steps doesn’t mean candidates aren’t stressed, despite your intentions.

httpspsps

I think diversifying was fairly inevtiable. What’s different is they’re not scraping your data

even better, maintain an account that’s complete lies to throw off their algorithm

(don’t do this - your life matters)

I understand where you’re coming from, but I don’t agree it’s about semantics; it’s about devaluation of communication. LLMs and their makers threaten that in multiple ways. Thinking of it as “lying” is one of them.

and here’s the instructions for future reference …