Yes, I think that’s the scenario most commenters are missing; Wikipedia could evolve into something it’s not. Then what good are backups as they won’t capture the decades/centuries to come.

Then we’d be extinct you mean.

And the money was going to give Sandy Hook victims higher compensation iirc.

You can grow a vinegar or kombucha mother in it.

I hear you. No distro has anything compared to Arch’s wiki, and NixOS’ documentation is currently mixed at best. For what it’s worth, NixOS’ package repository is comparable to the AUR. I have yet to run into anything I use on AUR that isn’t available in the official NixOS package repository.

If this guy follows the rabbit hole he’ll soon be using NixOS with Impermanence and wiping to a clean setup every reboot.

Thankfully it’s still in the uncanny valley.

On the tower defense, upgrading the Laser Tower (to Beam Emitter) breaks the game.

Took me a minute. And for good measure… ;

This should be what’s on the icon for Space@beehaw

These tables existed long before we were drinking coffee in Europe and America. What did we call them then? Low tables? End tables? Baby tables??

Yeah but that’s why the cross-post feature exists in lemmy, so users can be part of similar communities without seeing the same story duplicated on their feed or having the conversation split in multiple places.

the future of complex web apps*

I can see in-browser games and containerized desktop application benefiting from wasm, but simple ecommerce sites without all the fluff can be just as performant with SSR or a multi-page application. For instance several years ago I built the frontend and middleware for the Hart Tools and Ryobi Tools websites using Nuxt for SSR and Algolia for the search. Images are the majority of CPU and network load and the websites are snappy as a result. Even this tech stack is overkill for what the websites need to do but my point is for general use case this or a similar tech stack won’t benefit from introducing wasm.

Is that a yes or no question, or merely a suggestion?

Let’s get everybody on WET, in fact, let’s just call it UTC and be done with time zones.

Generate endless markov nonsense for LLM crawlers to choke on. Basically the young kids (LLMs) being forced to listen to grandpa Markov’s senile babbling over an excruciatingly slow dinner…

The installation process at the time would have made him suicidal.

Since he’s touching the keyboard with unwashed hands it’s probably best he didn’t wipe.

Two gripes about on the cube rule; It doesn’t readily differentiate between topology of a dish and a single serving. It could very well add more dimensions to the identification model besides topology, there are plenty of other factors that define the portability and experience of eating a food (let’s face it, that’s what the debate of identification was really about this whole time.)

I would highly recommend the History of English Podcast. This particular observation made by OP is thoroughly covered in this particular episode: https://youtu.be/T0ED-FV7O50