Thank you for this new article.
Personally I have no use for Kuma but I am glade that you show us how you make it work with FreeBSD, nice little trick.
Good job!

oops ! I think I did not post that in the right /sub/community/ ? lol I don’t even know what is it called
Anyway the next one should be a better place for that video: https://blendit.bsd.cafe/c/bsd

Interesting, thank you for sharing this.

Well done sir!

I don’t know caddy so thank you for the advice, it looks interesting for my use case.

Yes, you can almost follow the gitea guides, it’s similar.

Thank you, I’ll go with this.
I’ll take advantage of having the package available through pkg instead of building port unless it brings features that I really need, I don’t need much only one user and on LAN so it’s unlikely I suppose.

I am a bit late but yep apparently it’s called Userscripts, that’s what the right side bar says.
Anyway well done mate, your theme is very good 👍

Perfect!
Thank you for your work and your blog posts too ;)

You’re welcome, happy to help :)

I see we still have a transparency issue though, at least with dark theme.
To compare here is how it looks for me:
OpenBSD: https://ibb.co/Xzx11sH
NetBSD: https://ibb.co/pWXyHLT
FreeBSD: https://ibb.co/sWvmxbG

While converting pick the “png” extension instead of “jpeg” that should solve the problem hopefully.

Ho god what am I reading now.
The Tao itself is already mystical, put it over programming style and you get something … I would say “special” and funny.
Good catch my friend 😆

Whatever the reason new blood is always welcome!

I am not sure to understand, I know what “rootless” means but “rootless root” needs a link or an explanation at least. But I am convinced that it’s not a dance thing:
https://rootlessroot.com

I’ve got them all, so I know what I am saying there is no reason for me to lie on such thing.
If I refer to the picture I would say they did some modifications after listening to the feedback and it’s a good thing.
The only regret when I see that picture is to think that I may be bought them too early.

Geekworm Pi 3 case (also fits Pi 2)

Exact, it fits to the Pi3 and Pi2 but there is a little inconvenience with the Pi2 because the power lights are on the left while the wholes on the case are on the right, so with the Pi2 you don’t see the green/red light. The rest of the case fits well.
It’s not a big deal but still one must be warned.

I’ve also ordered some extra strips of cooling pads and added them to the bottom side of the CPU and the RAM chip beneath - so that heat gets sent to the case as well.

Nice trick.

Yep the Flirc case is good looking but it stops there, it’s not as efficient as one would expect from passive cooling.
I tried few fanless cases, Flirc included and I was not impressed, the top of the case is not aluminum but plastic, strange choice.
Geekworm does a better job, at least the one I’ve got, never goes over 55°C in hot summer, the rest of the year is around 39°C to 43°C not more.
The case is heavy and sturdy, it doesn’t feels cheap at all.
https://geekworm.com/collections/raspberry-pi/products/raspberry-pi-4-heavy-duty-aluminum-passive-cooling-metal-case

git clone https://github.com/NetBSD/src

Apparently you can use git instead if you prefer (from page 9)

deleted by creator

Here we go … again.

After thinking of it /usr/local should be more technically right like you and OP said.
But at this time I hope OP already took a decision :)

Amazing would definitely not be the word I’d use for this movie, average fits it better. It’s not terrible but it’s far from great either.

I liked the acting in some scenes, but the rest is meh you won’t see anything you haven’t already seen somewhere else.
The story is pretty basic, I had to watch the movie in three parts over two days, this how not interesting the story is …
I mean there is no suspense they sold the plot in the title already.

Otherwise they could manage a enjoyable film, they had good actors and the budget but Netflix has to do its thing, so creativity is not part of the plan. For me it is a 5/10, only because of the actor’s effort otherwise it would be 3.5.