@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 4 months agoWindows Recall demands an extraordinary level of trust that Microsoft hasn’t earnedarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1478arrow-down13cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1475arrow-down1external-linkWindows Recall demands an extraordinary level of trust that Microsoft hasn’t earnedarstechnica.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 4 months agomessage-square27fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squareToes♀linkfedilinkEnglish41•4 months agoAnything that takes data off the computer is a no fly zone.
minus-squareZeppolinkfedilinkEnglish37•4 months agoIt doesn’t transmit the data; it supposedly stores it locally. The issue is it’s a huge convenient plaintext trove of information if the system is compromised.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish13•4 months agoAnything that copies, or persist data to a new location should also be a no-fly zone
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish14•4 months agoAs long as it’s your choice, sure. But surprising users and system architects with surprise copies is going to break lots of data security models and behaviors.
Anything that takes data off the computer is a no fly zone.
It doesn’t transmit the data; it supposedly stores it locally. The issue is it’s a huge convenient plaintext trove of information if the system is compromised.
Anything that copies, or persist data to a new location should also be a no-fly zone
I’ll keep my off-site backups, thank you very much.
As long as it’s your choice, sure.
But surprising users and system architects with surprise copies is going to break lots of data security models and behaviors.