• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    420 days ago

    Yes. However I can just avoid using ipv6 by NATing the fuck out of my network lol. Kick that can!

    • DefederateLemmyMl
      link
      fedilink
      219 days ago

      You don’t even have to NAT the fuck out of your network. NAT is usually only needed in one place: where your internal network meets the outside world, and it provides a clean separation between the two as well, which I like.

      For most internal networks there really are no advantages to moving to IPv6 other than bragging rights.

      The more I think about it, the more I find IPv6 a huge overly complicated mistake. For the issue they wanted to solve, worldwide public IP shortage, they could have just added an octet to IPv4 to multiply the number of available addresses with 256 and called it a day. Not every square cm of the planet needs a public IP.