• YouTube is testing server-side ad injection to counter ad blockers, integrating ads directly into videos to make them indistinguishable from the main content.
  • This new method complicates ad blocking, including tools like SponsorBlock, which now face challenges in accurately identifying and skipping sponsored segments.
  • The feature is currently in testing and not widely rolled out, with YouTube encouraging users to subscribe to YouTube Premium for an ad-free experience.
  • MajorHavoc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    If only I had a client with support for fast forward… Oh right. I do. Neat.

    • GreatDong3000@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Some people said that skipping is blocked during the ad. But if that is the case I am sure either the timestamp is predictable or somewhere on the client side you could find the information about the timestamp.

      • MajorHavoc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        My client pre-downloads videos, so I can fast forward and rewind at will.

      • [email protected]@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s neat, it’d be identifiable in a fashion similar to missile logic. You know where ads are based on where they aren’t. Actually skipping it would be difficult but muting and doing something else for a predetermined period has been a workaround since radio.

      • PixelAlchemist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Google’s own Shaka sdk (video playback with ads) gives ad markers in the initial video manifest so that they can be marked on the timeline, so hopefully it’ll be trivial. Usually (but not always) with SSAI, the ads are spliced into the stream just before being sent to the client. That way if a user has just recently watched an ad pod, the server can choose to ignore that marker for a better UX in hopes that they don’t bounce if ads are too frequent.

      • elliot_crane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I doubt it… They couldn’t even manage to block FFWD on their own website for the longest time. I switched to using alternative front ends long ago, but back when I just used YT directly from my phone’s browser, spam tapping +5s a few times would bypass the ad.