• CodeBlooded
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Who gets to have the time-zone that’s noon at noon

    I am asserting that we abandon this concept of “noon” having to be precisely when the pixels on the my clock take the form of “12:00”.

    Who cares? Just let “noon” be whatever mid-day is where you live.

    0 isn’t my midnight

    Same thing, why does it matter? Why do people cling to this? Midnight should be when you are mid-way through the night, regardless of what time a clock shows.

    It also doesn’t fix the “what time of day is it elsewhere in the world” problem, which still requires knowledge of time differences. You know. Time zones.

    I don’t have time zones memorized, so I have to look up this information when I need to know it anyway. I did say in my post that the [time] “zones” would still exist if I had my way with UTC. I do still think it’s valuable to know the operating hours for different parts of the earth- I just think we can track this without having to have the madness that is time zones. However, while answering this, I do feel what you’re saying. Perhaps we do keep time zones, but only as a way to tell time that is secondary to UTC? (As compared to today, where UTC is often an afterthought, if people even think about it at all.)

    • palordrolap@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Stealing from another commenter: Are you OK with referring to days of the week as Tuesday/Wednesday, or do you propose abandoning day names altogether? If you say your local day is Tuesday which doesn’t align with someone else’s Tuesday, you’ve still got the old time-zone problem just at a coarser grain.

      As for “secondary time” yes. That’s called local time. Which is what the initial proposal was trying to be rid of.

      Now riddle me this: What time do you have your computer’s motherboard set to?