• DMBFFF
    link
    fedilink
    -3022 months ago

    partially because he got into legal hassles for using an AR-15 to defend himself against people who wanted to harm him.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1802 months ago

      My guy, he crossed state lines with a firearm that wasn’t his, to go to a protest where the only people injured and killed were by his trigger finger because he put himself that situation. That’s not defending yourself. He’s functionally a home invader crying over the dead body of the homeowner he killed because the homeowner brandished a skateboard.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        832 months ago

        No, no, his friend bought him the gun because he couldn’t buy it himself. But somehow that wasn’t a straw purchase.

      • DMBFFF
        link
        fedilink
        -1612 months ago

        He’s functionally a home invader crying over the dead body of the homeowner he killed because the homeowner brandished a skateboard.

        poor analogy.

        Home invaders want to rob and those in the homes are innocent victims, and it was a glock, not a skateboard.

        I have little tolerance for looters and vandals, some of whom might be wp:agent provocateurs.

        • AmbiguousProps
          link
          fedilink
          English
          702 months ago

          I have little tolerance for dumbasses and idiots, some of whom may be trolls.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            132 months ago

            He’s referencing Gaige Grosskreutz who had a Glock. Anthony Huber was the one who attempted to use a skateboard as a bludgeon. Joseph Rosenbaum attempted to take Rittenhouse’s rifle after he had tried to distance himself.

            https://youtu.be/GrVKqTCdM-A

            Grosskreutz was hit in the arm and testified to aiming his pistol at Rittenhouse during the televised trial.

    • Adderbox76
      link
      fedilink
      English
      782 months ago

      I don’t know why I’m bothering to feed a troll. But he literally travelled there in order to put himself in a situation where he might have to defend himself because he wanted to fucking shoot someone. He purposefully created the opportunity to shoot someone without having to “technically” be the attacker.

      • DMBFFF
        link
        fedilink
        -1172 months ago

        and you’re probably right, and the rioters and looters (assuming they are rioters and looters) accommodated him.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          29
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I hope you make a sincere attempt to understand why your comment is being downvoted so much and I truly hope you use this as an opportunity to grow as a compassionate human being

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            14
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            It is not possible for a conservative to experience compassion. Empathy is simply not a conservative trait.

          • DMBFFF
            link
            fedilink
            -962 months ago

            I’m being downvoted because I’m taking a rightist position in a forum of leftists, some who are quite thoughtful, others aren’t and are reactive.

            • Hegar
              link
              fedilink
              462 months ago

              You’re being downvoted because you’re objectively wrong, factually and morally. The kid went out with the intention to kill someone, brought the tools to do it, and did it. It was absolutely premeditated. He killed people trying to disarm him. He did not act in self defense, he murdered 2 people in cold blood.

              He was allowed to get away with it because the republican party and their allies want to encourage more vigilantes to be killing leftists and minorities.

          • DMBFFF
            link
            fedilink
            -582 months ago

            I could be wrong as I’ve yet to read the Wikipedia article.

            Who did he kill: a few guys who were guilty of nothing, but their blackness made them targets of a bigot; or were they engaged in criminal activity and then threatened him when he showed up. If it’s the former, then he’s a criminal who should be prosecuted. If it’s the latter, I feel a bit freer to indulge in moral relativism.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              142 months ago

              I’d say the swathes of downvotes and removal of your comments by mods would make you go read about it before jumping to his defence.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -52 months ago

                The removal of a comment by mods on lemmy makes me more likely to think he’s got a point, actually. I haven’t checked the modlog though, maybe it was bullshit.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  52 months ago

                  That’s an odd take. His replies are basically just basking in the downvotes and admitting that he doesn’t actually have knowledge of the incident.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  52 months ago

                  Haven’t checked the actual mod logs but there’s a glitch w/ Boost that lets you read removed comments. One was a statement on how many down votes a comment had at a particular time.

                  Another called people who downvoted him ideologues and compared them to redditors. Which I can see being a violation of rule 1, although it wasn’t targeted at any single person and the worst insult thrown was him calling people redditors.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I get what you’re TRYING to say, but you’re failing.

      He crossed state lines, and attempted to intimidate folks who were protesting while being non-white. How dare they! (/S…)

      He was happily intimidating people by larping as an operator, and then he started getting moved on, (by the people who were growing less intimidated by him), tried to remove him, and especially, remove his weapon. He didn’t need to be there.

      Because he brought a fucking rifle to a protest where people are GONNA disagree, he turned a conflict into a tragedy. In his mind, he was just having fun intimidating minorities, but then shit got real, and he “had to defend himself”. Instead of leaving, his only option was lethal force right??? Of course he couldn’t have moved back about 100 yards to be surrounded by very sympathetic cops…

      Sure, he probably did have a flash of fear when folks tried to take his gun, and decided to defend himself. (In the sense that if you are holding a lethal weapon, you CANNOT allow someone to take it from you. Even though he shouldn’t have had it at all…as his having it predicated the entire engagement) But the whole way he got there, the whole motivation to be there was to intimidate people, hoping that holding a gun would make him untouchable.

      He is a murderer, he either premeditated killing, or at least premeditated being OK with killing. At a protest. Where there were already police. At the very minimum he showed up to use his race, his weapon, and his political alignment to intimidate, and that’s fucked up all on its own.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      23
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Fuck off. He went out of his way to Cross state lines just to shoot someone. Then, he murdered someone in cold blood. Pathetic that people like you are still sucking his Dick…