@[email protected] to solarpunk [email protected] • edit-21 month ago"but they sting/bite/are toxic/are icky" blah blah. nature does not owe you safetyslrpnk.netimagemessage-square146fedilinkarrow-up1743arrow-down170
arrow-up1673arrow-down1image"but they sting/bite/are toxic/are icky" blah blah. nature does not owe you safetyslrpnk.net@[email protected] to solarpunk [email protected] • edit-21 month agomessage-square146fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 month agoJust because something is good for the environment doesn’t mean the environment can’t live without it
minus-squareJackbyDevlinkEnglish3•1 month agoThe world would survive an extinction event given enough time, that doesn’t mean the loss of biodiversity is acceptable.
Just because something is good for the environment doesn’t mean the environment can’t live without it
The world would survive an extinction event given enough time, that doesn’t mean the loss of biodiversity is acceptable.