Some of the LinkedIn Responses are direct and on-point, and also hilariously/depressingly based depending on how you look at it:

EDIT: In hindsight, I think I should’ve looked into posting this in a different community… It’s closer to a silly “innovation”… soo… is this considered FUD? I also don’t support smoking or vaping, especially among kids. Original title had “privacy-violating” before the “solution”.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5217 days ago

    Unless there will be disciplinary follow-up ( -> no reason for this design), I only see this going the way of de-facto scoreboards among kids.

    • @Zikeji
      link
      English
      1617 days ago

      Considering it only detects if someone in the bathroom is vaping and not who, disciplinary action just isn’t really possible with your typical school restroom.

      • TWeaK
        link
        fedilink
        English
        816 days ago

        The main picture says “Vape Sensor in Simon’s Desk”, so it sounds like each pupil’s desk is going to have a sensor.

        • @Zikeji
          link
          English
          316 days ago

          That’s what I thought at first, but the person who wrote the article is named Simon, and based on the context given in the article I’m assuming that was a test unit he had on his desk, but the planned implementation is in bathrooms.

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -616 days ago

        They can send people to investigate. Also you could just have someone outside. It should be fairly obvious.

        It doesn’t replace humans but it can compliment them. I’m not sure why people see this as a privacy issue. We aren’t talking about some scary mass surveillance system here

        • Lightor
          link
          fedilink
          916 days ago

          This is taking the route of individual monitoring and public shaming to prevent vaping. That doesn’t work, especially with teens.

          • Possibly linux
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -216 days ago

            It isn’t individual monitoring. It is an alarm in the bathroom. It can also detect smoke from a fire.

            • Lightor
              link
              fedilink
              6
              edit-2
              16 days ago

              And if there’s one kid in the bathroom or a person posted by the bathroom watching the monitor? This feels very police state, monitor and enforce not educate and encourage.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          116 days ago

          Then why publish detection events like this? If they do start following up, all it does is warn perpetrators, and allow for fast iteration of anti-detection, to say nothing of other concerns people have mentioned (tripping other people’s detectors etc.)

    • Possibly linux
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -116 days ago

      They can just send in security to investigate. Maybe not every time the alarm is tripped but if they start seeing often they can start making connections. They can basically plan a bust once in a while.