• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    449 days ago

    It is a stupid law being applied in the most ridiculous way, by being punished for the police’s actions.

    • @GetOffMyLan
      link
      309 days ago

      But several in the group, including Washington, fired shots at Millbrook police officers who responded Feb. 23, 2015,

      They fired at the police and one died as a result. They were all charged with murder.

      Seems the law is being applied correctly.

      As for the law itself I’m pretty torn on this. If someone dragged my kid along to a crime and they died as a result I’d have no problem with them getting charged for their murder.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        319 days ago

        And what if someone dragged your kid along to a crime, then got themself shot and your kid now has to spend basically their whole life in jail?

        • @GetOffMyLan
          link
          11
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          That’s exactly why I’m torn. Be pretty hypocritical not to allow it to be applied the other way right?

          And it was 25 years anyway for the crime plus it seems there was a lot more going on in this case including a couple other murders.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            No, it’s not hypocritical because you’re missing (or ignoring) intent. Someone pressures your relative into doing a crime, reluctantly. Now the other criminal gets killed and your reluctant relative is on the hook for a murder they didn’t commit during a crime they didn’t really want to be a part of.

            That is in no way comparable to a mastermind gathering a bunch of stooges for a suicide mission and getting them to commit death by cop.

            • @GetOffMyLan
              link
              19 days ago

              Fair point.

              But here he did shoot at the cops.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            09 days ago

            No there wasn’t. That was a separate case that we don’t know the disposition of. That commenter brought them in but in any court that kind of argument is banned unless they were convicted or it’s part of the matter before the court.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            159 days ago

            You are missing the point of the argument. Prison is supposed to be for rehabilitation anyway; except in extreme circumstances. This type of law and sentence only exists to feed the for-profit prison system.

            Most importantly! Why the fuck are common thieves being put in prison for life when the Boeing execs — whose premeditated fraud directly killed of hundreds of people — are chilling with the plutocracy on their 3rd yacht?

            • @GetOffMyLan
              link
              39 days ago

              I mean they’re being put away for shooting at the cops and robbing people.

              But your point about the execs stands.

          • @GetOffMyLan
            link
            59 days ago

            This case does seem pretty open and shut tbf.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            39 days ago

            Which has dick all to do with the murder charge. It is not normal to charge someone for a murder they didn’t commit.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              Hey, don’t blame me, I’m just replying to them. I wasn’t the one to bring it up

              And what if someone dragged your kid along to a crime, then got themself shot and your kid now has to spend basically their whole life in jail?