Arthur Besse to [email protected]English • 3 days ago"participants who had access to an AI assistant wrote significantly less secure code" and "were also more likely to believe they wrote secure code" - 2023 Stanford University study published at CCS23arxiv.orgmessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1365arrow-down17
arrow-up1358arrow-down1external-link"participants who had access to an AI assistant wrote significantly less secure code" and "were also more likely to believe they wrote secure code" - 2023 Stanford University study published at CCS23arxiv.orgArthur Besse to [email protected]English • 3 days agomessage-square38fedilink
minus-square@Sl00klinkEnglish1•2 days agoThat’s definitely valid, but just because a tool is used for scam doesn’t inherently mean it’s a scam. I don’t call the cellphone a scam because most my calls are.
That’s definitely valid, but just because a tool is used for scam doesn’t inherently mean it’s a scam. I don’t call the cellphone a scam because most my calls are.