@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 day agoWe lost Keanumander.xyzimagemessage-square233fedilinkarrow-up1418arrow-down118
arrow-up1400arrow-down1imageWe lost Keanumander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 day agomessage-square233fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish46•10 hours agoYou can instantly tell someone is full of shit when they treat scientific scrutiny as if it’s a holy war. Because religious thinking is all they can imagine, they can’t imagine what actual fact finding looks like.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish16•10 hours ago they can’t imagine what actual fact finding looks like Facts aren’t useful for setting policy if people don’t believe in them. Just ask any climatologist.
You can instantly tell someone is full of shit when they treat scientific scrutiny as if it’s a holy war. Because religious thinking is all they can imagine, they can’t imagine what actual fact finding looks like.
What did they do to Galileo?
Facts aren’t useful for setting policy if people don’t believe in them. Just ask any climatologist.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQPsKvG6WMI&t=2m22s