@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 14 hours agoMe giving advice about text editorslemmy.worldimagemessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up1628arrow-down136
arrow-up1592arrow-down1imageMe giving advice about text editorslemmy.world@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 14 hours agomessage-square93fedilink
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)linkfedilink6•5 hours agoGetting used to vim has made nano unusable for me. The muscle memory is too strong. That and all of the regex and plugin features (ex. LSP) are just too useful.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•4 hours agoI had the same experience. Nano is great if you’re used to notepad or a generic, limited text editor. Once you learn a terminal editor like eMacs or vim, why go back? So much less hand motion going to mouse, arrows, and back.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•6 hours agoI liked Micro just a little bit more than Nano
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 hours agofirst time hearing about it gota give it a try
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•6 hours agoI tried Micro and I found that its just Nano with a better interface and much easier to use. Its great actually but I like the vim movements.
nano just works for me man
Getting used to vim has made nano unusable for me. The muscle memory is too strong. That and all of the regex and plugin features (ex. LSP) are just too useful.
I had the same experience. Nano is great if you’re used to notepad or a generic, limited text editor.
Once you learn a terminal editor like eMacs or vim, why go back? So much less hand motion going to mouse, arrows, and back.
I liked Micro just a little bit more than Nano
first time hearing about it gota give it a try
I tried Micro and I found that its just Nano with a better interface and much easier to use. Its great actually but I like the vim movements.