Luis Norambuena to PythonEnglish • 10 hours agouv IS the Future of Python Packaging 🐍📦www.youtube.commessage-square20arrow-up120arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up116arrow-down1external-linkuv IS the Future of Python Packaging 🐍📦www.youtube.comLuis Norambuena to PythonEnglish • 10 hours agomessage-square20file-text
minus-square@dallenlink2•5 hours agoI’ve been mostly a poetry guy but have tested out uv a bit lately. Two main advantages I see are being able to install Python (I relied on pyenv before) and it’s waaay faster at solving/installing dependencies.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•4 hours agoYeah, it certainly looks nice, but my problems are: everything runs in a docker container locally, so I don’t think the caching is going to be a huge win we have a half-dozen teams and a dozen repositories or so, across three time zones, so big changes require a fair amount of effort we just got through porting to poetry to split into dependency groups, and going back to not having that is a tough sell So for me, it needs to at least have feature parity w/ poetry to seriously consider.
minus-squareEager EaglelinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-22 hours agouv is still faster with a cold cache and uv does have dep groups about the second problem, there’s an issue open on writing a migration guide, but migrating manually is not too difficult.
I’ve been mostly a poetry guy but have tested out uv a bit lately. Two main advantages I see are being able to install Python (I relied on pyenv before) and it’s waaay faster at solving/installing dependencies.
Yeah, it certainly looks nice, but my problems are:
So for me, it needs to at least have feature parity w/ poetry to seriously consider.
uv is still faster with a cold cache
and uv does have dep groups
about the second problem, there’s an issue open on writing a migration guide, but migrating manually is not too difficult.