• parpol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Who needs Windows? You need to use better applications. And if work requires Windows, this article still doesn’t apply because it is the company’s responsibility, not yours, and running on an unsupported machine is a security risk.

    • Famko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I use Linux and none of the programs I need for structural engineering work on Linux.

      Trust me, I would totally ditch the dual boot if I could, but sadly, I can’t

      • parpol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        What are they called? What do you need for Linux that only works on Windows or Mac right now?

        • Famko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Revit, Tekla, AutoCAD, the usual. I have tried out FreeCAD but found it clunky to use comparably.

          • parpol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Try BriscCAD. It is very similar to AutoCAD and supports their files.

            Revit seems to work fine with Wine, and although wineHQ reports Tekla performance as garbage, that was a very long time ago. It probably works better now.

            • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Trust me, if you’re used to the AutoCAD workflow and UI, BricsCAD is just different enough that it can be a bit jarring and a huge drop to your productivity.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Because of course there’s absolutely no program a regular person outside of work could possibly need Windows for. None at all. Not a single application. Not a single game. Not a single piece of hardware they’re using (like many laptops with hardware needing specific drivers that don’t exist for linux).

      Nope, absolutely nothing a regular user could have a need for Windows.

      • parpol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I didn’t say all applications work. I said use better ones.

        As for hardware, less computers support win11 than Linux. You can run Linux on 40 year old computers, and on brand new computers.

        Ans this article is literally about bypassing the restrictions that were put in place to protect users with CPUs that have the specte and meltdown vulnerabilities. You’re safer on win10 even after they stop supporting it than win11.

          • parpol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 hours ago

            If you’d rather risk becoming a botnet node than to even consider using alternative software then you are absolutely using it wrong.

            If your computer doesn’t support win11, then switching to Linux before win10 ends is the only right choice. The other less right choices are:

            Stay on win10, Upgrade to win11 and disconnect it from the network and the internet permanently.

            The worst choice is do what OP did.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      I’m sorry but “you need to use better applications” is very funny to read when most of the time the Linux open source alternative will never be as good as the product made by the company that has hundreds of paid employees working on it.

      • parpol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Except most big open source project are developed by companies, and only the tiny ones aren’t. This applies to all open source projects on all platforms.

        Also, most of them already are better. People just don’t want to change their layouts and workflows. And people also don’t value privacy, which if they would, they wouldn’t rate the proprietary software as half as good.

      • imecth@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        made by the company that has hundreds of paid employees working on it.

        You’d have a point there, if the company’s aim was solely to make a better product; it’s been increasingly about increasing their margins at the expense of the users, advertising as much as possible and buying out the competition.

      • sqw@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        otoh a lot of the most useful and enduring software ever made has been made by volunteers in their spare time