• MajorHavoc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Heh. As an always angry software engineer, this resonates with me.

    Computers are hard to work with, and the majority of us who work with them aren’t qualified in any meaningful way to do so. And yet, leaving that work to other, far less qualified people, would be dramatically worse for everyone concerned.

    We should all “get gud”. Most of us are trying every day.

    AI will continue to help a little, but about a thousand times less than we’ve been promised.

    I hope many of you reading along here, who hear the call to software engineering, and join me in being perpetually not quite good enough at it.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m not a software engineer, I’m a sysadmin.
      But I often wonder: Does good software actually exist?
      I mean software where the devs were given a realistic scope and enough resources, understand the codebase, were allowed to do the best they could, didn’t have to push out premature code with lots of temporary workarounds left in, and the documentation is complete?

      Cause I sometimes feel that all software except for some tiny suckless tools is cobbled-together and in a constant state of disrepair.

      • MajorHavoc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Cause I sometimes feel that all software except for some tiny suckless tools is cobbled-together and in a constant state of disrepair.

        Yep! It’s a fascinating mix of bad timelines, bad tools, and most of us not yet having mastered even our tiny corner of the craft.

        But I’ve been assured that AI will solve all of that.

      • fuzzzerd
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        This maybe in the tool camp, but Aegis is pretty good. Just works, no fuss.