• onlinepersona
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’m actually surprised there is no specification. It’s how I thought languages were written: spec first, implementation later. Do RFCs serve this purpose?

    Anti Commercial-AI license

    • BatmanAoD
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s actually not how any language has ever been written, though it’s easy to get that impression from how much the C and C++ communities emphasize their formal specifications.

      But in fact, both languages were in production use for over a decade before they had a formal spec. And languages with formal specifications are actually a tiny minority of programming languages.

    • snaggenOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      That requires a complete picture and all possible use cases from the start. Initially when a language is new and hardly used there are much to benefit from flexibility and trying new concepts. Then as the language matures, a more formal process is needed to ensure stability. There is a reason these discussions comes now, since rust is in a very stable phase.

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        There might also just not be a single spec because the information is spread out over RFCs instead of being collected in a central location.