A great read for folks wondering why Java uses type erasure instead of “reified” generics. For the unaware, that means that a List<Integer> is a List<Object> at runtime. I had always wondered about it and why they didn’t take the alternative route. For context, C# does have reified types so the actual type parameter is available at runtime.

I personally love reading in depth discussions about counter intuitive engineering decisions like this.

  • JackbyDevOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, agreed. My first project as a junior dev was on Java 6 using something written before Java 5 that they sort of slapped generics all over for no apparent reason. So many warnings lol.