Something something you are not allowed to criticize if it was hard to make something something…
something something don’t take a technical opinion as a personal offend when I didn’t intend to do so…
I appreciate the hard work, but just stating an opinion that a thing like this makes too much assumptions about the whole stack, it would be hard to scale and change, in other words: not modular enough to be worth a library. Like no way lichess.org or whatever would use this, considering the complexity and lots of custom logic they have
No it doesn’t. You didn’t and you have no idea what you are talking about. I don’t need an advice on what kinds of comments I should leave, thanks, I will decide for myself
I imagine any game will want to modify this overengineered wrapper for its needs at some point
Something something … it’s easy to criticize hard to create … something something
Something something you are not allowed to criticize if it was hard to make something something…
something something don’t take a technical opinion as a personal offend when I didn’t intend to do so…
I appreciate the hard work, but just stating an opinion that a thing like this makes too much assumptions about the whole stack, it would be hard to scale and change, in other words: not modular enough to be worth a library. Like no way lichess.org or whatever would use this, considering the complexity and lots of custom logic they have
I’m not even the author, but I looked at it, and it does look quite flexible.
It’s also not like it needs to be able to handle every case conceivable to be useful.
If you don’t have something nice or constructive to say, you should keep your opinion to yourself.
No it doesn’t. You didn’t and you have no idea what you are talking about. I don’t need an advice on what kinds of comments I should leave, thanks, I will decide for myself