:: Remove make dependencies after install? [y/N] y
If I didn’t remove make dependencies, would yay/pacman be smart enough to know the thing I am installing does not actually depend on them? It’s a very nice feature of package managers that they track dependencies and can do things like remove “dangling” dependencies and I don’t want to mess that up with some random dependencies needed only for a build. But I also don’t want to install something every time I need to build lol.
So does yay and/or pacman know that the things I am installing don’t actually depend on the make dependencies?
Solution: Keeping the make dependencies after install will not fool pacman and/or yay into thinking the make dependencies are “real” dependencies of whatever you’re building from AUR. They both correctly recognize them as orphans (unless of course something else actually depends on them). So feel free to not remove them during install without worrying about dependency graphs getting tarnished; you’ll be able to easily remove them later if you’d like.
Awesome! Thanks so much. This has been helpful. I reinstalled the package and chose to keep the build dependencies. When I run
pacman -Qii foo
(wherefoo
is the thing frommakedepends
) I can see that is is required by nothing. Also,pacman -Qtd
shows it as an orphan (as expected). This is perfect and exactly what I was trying to figure out. I can “safely” (not that there would’ve been danger) keep these dependencies without the package managers being fooled into thinking they’re actually needed to run the thing once installed.