cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor · 1 day agoWhy indeedlemmy.mlimagemessage-square167fedilinkarrow-up11.3Karrow-down123cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.28Karrow-down1imageWhy indeedlemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor · 1 day agomessage-square167fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareTedDallaslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up41·13 hours ago#include “the_entire_fucking_internet.h”
minus-squareTeamAssimilation@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up9·11 hours agoYou know we’ve reached peak bloat and stupidity when JavaScript web apps have a compilation step, and I don’t mean JIT.
minus-squarestetech@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·10 hours agoI’d rather take a compile step than having no type safety in JS, even as a user.
minus-squareNoSpotOfGround@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·10 hours agoExcept… the compilation step doesn’t add type safety to JS. As an aside, type safety hasn’t been something I truly miss in JS, despite how often it’s mentioned.
minus-squareLifter@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up7·8 hours agoI think they are talking about typescript which is compiled into javascript
#include “the_entire_fucking_internet.h”
You know we’ve reached peak bloat and stupidity when JavaScript web apps have a compilation step, and I don’t mean JIT.
I’d rather take a compile step than having no type safety in JS, even as a user.
Except… the compilation step doesn’t add type safety to JS.
As an aside, type safety hasn’t been something I truly miss in JS, despite how often it’s mentioned.
I think they are talking about typescript which is compiled into javascript