Lawmakers will on Saturday debate emergency legislation that would give the business secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, the power to keep the S****horpe British Steel site running as the government tries to find a buyer to co-invest in the steelmaker.
Lawmakers will on Saturday debate emergency legislation that would give the business secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, the power to keep the S****horpe British Steel site running as the government tries to find a buyer to co-invest in the steelmaker.
I presume “co-invest” means the steel maker becomes partially state owned. Which is only a good thing, or at least a move towards a good thing.
I mean, I’m super happy with both Scottish Water and ScotRail - both (now) state owned companies.
Sounds like it’s difficult to make steel these days (financially speaking), and the Chinese owners have kinda run the plant into the ground…
The numbers are interesting for how much the steel is actually worth to UK industry & economics (it’s in the article), but it’s about 1% of both. And about 0.3% of the world total of steel production.
But in these times, steel is important. And being able to locally/domestically produce good quality stuff is important to economical/military stability.
So, perhaps the monetary value is only 1%, but the intrinsic value of reliable domestic steel production might mean it’s worth a lot more.
Perhaps nationalisation with a big renovation to greener steel production is a good investment?
I have no idea, but it’s certainly something I would support. Keeps jobs, creates new jobs, reduces carbon of an existing high-carbon industr, and secured domestic steel production.
Seems like a lot of wins.