A few people pointed out that many rust projects were MIT licensed and since then I indeed have seen MIT licensed projects everywhere in Rust. Then I found the link of this post and it looks like MIT was by far the most popular license in all of opensource in 2023.

Any ideas why?

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      those are less permissive. mit license says “you want to make a new version and sell it? go ahead! be my guest” think of it as being the apache license with fewer words

      • hitwright@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        You can sell GPL software, even without any changes. The less permission part would be “You want to close-source it and not contribute back? Go ahead!”

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      GPL forces those who fork the project to open-source their contributions; same for MPL though GPL requires open-sourcing more things. EUPL is a bit obscure.