I did read everything you said and I do know how to do math. I hope you are able to enact the change you want to see in Wikipedia and the article. Good luck.
It’s funny that you define “ignore” as “not doing what you tell someone to” because by that definition you’ve been ignoring me too. Go edit the article if you feel this strongly.
Go tell Wikipedia about that, not me. It’s a community you can join. You very clearly feel very strongly about it. Talking to me about it isn’t going to change anything.
I did read everything you said and I do know how to do math. I hope you are able to enact the change you want to see in Wikipedia and the article. Good luck.
Clearly you didn’t, given you keep telling me to take it up with Harvard/Wiki
See?? There you go again ignoring what I told you about Wikipedia 🙄
I haven’t ignored anything you said. I’m telling you that if you have a problem with those that you should contact them to fix them.
You’ve ignored everything I’ve said about Wikipedia.
and you have again ignored what I told you about them 🙄
It’s funny that you define “ignore” as “not doing what you tell someone to” because by that definition you’ve been ignoring me too. Go edit the article if you feel this strongly.
Nope, I didn’t.
I’m ignoring the person failing to cite Maths textbooks, yes, that’s correct.
Go read what I said about what happens when ACTUAL MATHS PROFESSORS have tried to do EXACTLY THAT 🙄
Go tell Wikipedia about that, not me. It’s a community you can join. You very clearly feel very strongly about it. Talking to me about it isn’t going to change anything.
I’m telling you, the person pretending that it’s mathematically valid information
Yep, and be defeated, just like the Maths Professor Rick Norwood was, repeatedly.
Maths textbooks, yes, which you keep ignoring
And you talking about it isn’t going to change that you are wrong
Open a textbook: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_requests_for_adminship
Tell them, not me.