• towerful
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I disagree.
    Users likely trust their instances admins

    • TrustingZebra@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unless I run a Lemmy instance myself (which is possible), I have zero reason to trust an instance’s admins.

      Even if my instance’s admin happens to be the founder of privacyguides.org, that doesn’t mean he will never read any “private” messages (or be forced by someone else to hand them over).

        • TrustingZebra@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even if I did fully trust my instance, I also would have to trust any instance I message with.

          I personally just use Lemmy for public comments.

    • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What definition of safe are you using which makes a private messaging system without privacy safe? What would have to occur for it to become unsafe, if not being private does not make it unsafe in your eyes?