Isn’t it more that, govts have enough income (immigration) of disadvantaged people with high political value, that they don’t really need those low political value immigrants?
For the ideal case: Let’s say you have 2 people and only want 1 (you are not low in population). Which would you prefer?
Give money to Person. Person increases money circulation in community.
Person gives you work. Created value gets you x money. You pay Person x-y money. Person increases money circulation in community.
For the real case:
govts get loyalty by control, not by benevolence
govts would rather take some resentment from powerless and pay those already powerful. Because govts are made out of people too and would rather not get murdered
it’s easier for people to understand benevolence from a person than from a large organisation like a govt.
Isn’t it more that, govts have enough income (immigration) of disadvantaged people with high political value, that they don’t really need those low political value immigrants?
For the ideal case: Let’s say you have 2 people and only want 1 (you are not low in population). Which would you prefer?
xmoney. You pay Personx-ymoney. Person increases money circulation in community.For the real case: