I’m curious if there are things in the standard class library that you find useful but not widely used.

  • JackbyDevOPM
    link
    English
    21 year ago

    I didn’t have a specific goal, but yeah I do wish more people used Optional.

    My one “gripe” with Optional (and I use it lightly) is that they mean for it to only be used as a return type instead of anywhere something can be optional. It can still be used as that though, they just don’t recommend it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      IMHO it should be used for parameters, as long as there is more than one optional parameter. If rather all non nullable parameters though, which is usually doable.

      • JackbyDevOPM
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        I’ve waffled on it. Currently my opinion is to use whatever nullable annotation the project uses (if any, otherwise JetBrains’s). Essentially, I’m not sure if the official recommendation to avoid Optional for uses other than return types has reasoning I’m missing.

        I do use it like this though and lament that we don’t have an Elvis operator (?:)

        Optional.ofNullable(thingThatMightBeNull).map(e -> e.someMethod()).orElse(null);
        
        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Instead of wrapping it in an optional you can do Objects.requireNonNullElse(value, defaultValue)

          • @austin
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Optional has more syntactic sugar for more complex scenarios / functional call chaining that prevents repetitive if checks

            Optional.ofNullable(myObj)
              .map(MyClass::getProperty)
              .map(MyOtherClass::getAnotherProperty)
              .filter(obj -> somePredicate(obj))
              .orElse(null)
            

            This is completely null safe, the function calls are only made if the object is not null