The “precise and specific actions” called for in that article, specifically for the purpose of combating speech that encourages violence, like homophobia or white supremacy:
Reveal who is paying for advertisements, how much they are paying and who is being targeted.
Commit to meaningful transparency of platform algorithms so we know how and what content is being amplified, to whom, and the associated impact.
Turn on by default the tools to amplify factual voices over disinformation.
Work with independent researchers to facilitate in-depth studies of the platforms’ impact on people and our societies, and what we can do to improve things.
I don’t think being anti white supremacy and homophobia is shitty or controversial. Why would an Internet company write an article about something that affects the biggest sector of the Internet, social media? 🤔
“No they should stay in their lane and only talk about, I don’t know, CSS or something.” I don’t buy it.
The CEO of Brave literally supports Censorship so hard that he wants to censor gay marriage out of existence - this actually affects people in real life. When you use Brave, you directly support that individual and their shitty politics.
I used to think I was saying something when I crowed about “free speech” too, but white supremacists and other bigots are the cancelers. We’ve heard what the Nazis had to say but do you know what the minority voices they’ve been suppressing have to say? No you don’t.
deleted by creator
Are you talking about the ex-CEO who got BTFO for being homophobic? Because that was based and cool, actually.
deleted by creator
The “precise and specific actions” called for in that article, specifically for the purpose of combating speech that encourages violence, like homophobia or white supremacy:
Reveal who is paying for advertisements, how much they are paying and who is being targeted.
Commit to meaningful transparency of platform algorithms so we know how and what content is being amplified, to whom, and the associated impact.
Turn on by default the tools to amplify factual voices over disinformation.
Work with independent researchers to facilitate in-depth studies of the platforms’ impact on people and our societies, and what we can do to improve things.
What’s your problem here?
deleted by creator
The article is about social media.
deleted by creator
I don’t think being anti white supremacy and homophobia is shitty or controversial. Why would an Internet company write an article about something that affects the biggest sector of the Internet, social media? 🤔
“No they should stay in their lane and only talk about, I don’t know, CSS or something.” I don’t buy it.
deleted by creator
The CEO of Brave literally supports Censorship so hard that he wants to censor gay marriage out of existence - this actually affects people in real life. When you use Brave, you directly support that individual and their shitty politics.
cancelation is cool and good. stop being a bigot or cry harder.
deleted by creator
cry harder, chud
deleted by creator
Homophobes and transphobes should be censored and canceled ☺️
okay you see, when you use that word, it has connotations.
Again wow this is another alarm, the word use is now even more suspect
okay now this is just ridiculous you aint fooling anyone
deleted by creator
Says the person crying about cancel culture lmao
deleted by creator
I used to think I was saying something when I crowed about “free speech” too, but white supremacists and other bigots are the cancelers. We’ve heard what the Nazis had to say but do you know what the minority voices they’ve been suppressing have to say? No you don’t.
deleted by creator
They exist in this real world whether you like it or not.
Just a bit of a fool, a joker perhaps, maybe even a troll
you’re the one crying about cancellations over people not wanting to support a bigot, shitbag