• @KickMe
      link
      1
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • raven [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I don’t think being anti white supremacy and homophobia is shitty or controversial. Why would an Internet company write an article about something that affects the biggest sector of the Internet, social media? 🤔
        “No they should stay in their lane and only talk about, I don’t know, CSS or something.” I don’t buy it.

        • @KickMe
          link
          1
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • raven [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            510 months ago

            …the article you linked me? The topic of this discussion?

            It shouldn’t be controversial to anyone. The suggestions given there are pretty mild. Regardless, justice is not the absence of conflict. Sorry the article made you upset but that doesn’t make it wrong.

            • @KickMe
              link
              1
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              deleted by creator

              • raven [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                3
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                The opinion:
                “Homophobia and white supremacy are bad and should be combated”

                It’s interesting that you think firefox is being “controversial” when their CEO writes a couple paragraphs about combating hate speech online, but brave isn’t when their CEO sends money to hate organizations. 🤔

                If the user share of Firefox falls too low websites will stop supporting it (which is already happening), we will have given google the internet. Everything that is not Firefox is based on Chrome.