@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agoWell yes, but actually nojlai.luimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1457arrow-down10
arrow-up1457arrow-down1imageWell yes, but actually nojlai.lu@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-square@jormaiglink2•1 year agoYeah, but RAE is not happy with this solution. 😅 I think at some point they’ll come with their own proposal. For now I think that they emphasize non-gendered language instead of converting gendered words to non-gendered.
Yeah, but RAE is not happy with this solution. 😅 I think at some point they’ll come with their own proposal. For now I think that they emphasize non-gendered language instead of converting gendered words to non-gendered.