• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      For those looking for the handout:

      person: A B C D E F G H I J K L

      round 1: L L L L R R R R — — — -

      round 2: L L R R R — — — L R L -

      round 3: L R R — — L R — L L — R

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        This would be easier to parse with a monospaced font. I’m not sure how that works in lemmy so this might take an edit or two…

        
        round 1: L L L L R R R R — — — -
        
        round 2: L L R R R — — — L R L -
        
        round 3: L R R — — L R — L L — R```
        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Oh i get it. So if in round 1 it tilted down on the right. Round 2 it was even then round 3 it tilted down on the right then it was person G and they are heavier. However if it was reversed and tilted on the left then even then left then it was still person G but they are lighter. Because that pattern only occurs once. This is brilliant. Thankyou to you and the person you corrected the formatting of.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      210 months ago

      How do you solve that? I saw a solution in the comments where it says to start with numbering all the people and butting 1234 and 5678 on the see saw, then it says if they weight the same then continue and that seems to work. But if they dont weigh the same it doesnt work and it doesnt say what to do in that case.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        010 months ago

        you can do it like you weight 6v6 then 3v3 then for the last weighing you weight the 2 out of 3.

        or you weigh 4v4 to find out which grouping of 4 the light weight person is in, then do 2v2 and 1v1.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            That’s not the question. Either the scales balance, and the third is heavier or lighter, or the scales don’t balance and you get both answers, but the question is purposely framed this way

            • I mean that not knowing it is part of the question, and the proposed solution doesn’t work without knowing if the person is heavier or lighter.

              If you know if the person is heavier or lighter, the question becomes trivial.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                010 months ago

                The question is to figure out who is different, not how they are different. That takes one more step, half the time.

                • Yes, I’m aware. But with 12 people you can’t simply divvy the groups in threes constantly, because if you weigh and the groups are unequal, then you don’t know in which group the different person is (yet). E.g., weighing ABCD - EFGH can tell you the different person is in IJKL if the groups are even, but if they’re uneven you don’t know in which of the other two groups the different person is.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  010 months ago

                  The question was to find who doesnt weigh the same and if its heavier or lighter. Watch the clip again.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    110 months ago

                    That’s easy enough to answer, but he really should work on his grammar. In that case you just do 3 groups of three, weigh two of them. If they’re even, the third group is different. Weigh 2 membres of the third group, they’ll either be even or one heavier. Weight the last member against the heavier one from step 2 to see if they’re even or not for your answer.