@[email protected] to [email protected] • 7 months agolinux rulesopuli.xyzimagemessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up11.09Karrow-down12
arrow-up11.09Karrow-down1imagelinux rulesopuli.xyz@[email protected] to [email protected] • 7 months agomessage-square82fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•7 months ago the amount of food it requires to feed the meat we eat is extremely wasteful a lot of what we give livestock are parts of plants that people can’t or won’t eat. that’s the opposite of wasteful.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•7 months agoParts of plans that were specifically grown for livestock that we won’t eat, that is. At least a big part.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•7 months agoi’m talking about waste product from our crops, like cottonseed from the textile industry or soymeal leftover from making soybean oil or silage.
minus-squareFeydaikinlinkfedilink1•7 months agoAnd he’s talking about crops specifically grown for livestock. Of which there is quite a lot. Hell, even pets that aren’t considered live-stock outright, like Horses, consume tremendous amounts of feed that isn’t just by-products.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•7 months ago And he’s talking about crops specifically grown for livestock. what i said was true. what they said wasn’t nuance, it was stated as a contradiction. your framing of it as nuance is a red herring.
a lot of what we give livestock are parts of plants that people can’t or won’t eat. that’s the opposite of wasteful.
Parts of plans that were specifically grown for livestock that we won’t eat, that is. At least a big part.
i’m talking about waste product from our crops, like cottonseed from the textile industry or soymeal leftover from making soybean oil or silage.
And he’s talking about crops specifically grown for livestock. Of which there is quite a lot. Hell, even pets that aren’t considered live-stock outright, like Horses, consume tremendous amounts of feed that isn’t just by-products.
what i said was true. what they said wasn’t nuance, it was stated as a contradiction. your framing of it as nuance is a red herring.