• stevedidWHAT
    link
    fedilink
    1610 months ago

    Nah, natural disasters are disasters through and through. I’m not aware of any eco friendly power gen that can benefit from extreme or dangerous weather sadly

    • @pan_troglodytes
      link
      English
      110 months ago

      ah, that’s unfortunate. might be something they’ll want to work towards

      • stevedidWHAT
        link
        fedilink
        410 months ago

        Without a doubt. I think (if high school memory serves me right) geothermal is one of the harder power gens just because of how much can go wrong/brittle the process is, but I’m not sure if that includes nuclear power in the mix.

        Arguably nuclear is one of the most powerful although it has plenty of drawbacks like waste disposal (as if we don’t already have an issue with this lmao)

        • @pan_troglodytes
          link
          English
          210 months ago

          there’s good ways to store the nuclear waste but they’re not politically acceptable. easier to just let it pile up and make it someone else’s problem.

          • stevedidWHAT
            link
            fedilink
            110 months ago

            Really? News to me, got anything specifically I can look at or research more?

            • @pan_troglodytes
              link
              English
              19 months ago

              well there’s glassifying it (encapsulating the waste in an obsidian/glass container), burying it deep, deep underground in a seismically neutral/void area, and the ever popular launching it into the Sun.

              • stevedidWHAT
                link
                fedilink
                19 months ago

                How long does that obsidian glass container last?

                And would sending additional entropy to the sun really be without consequence?