sunnie@lemmy.ca to Programmer Humor · 1 year agono.. just nolemmy.caimagemessage-square95fedilinkarrow-up1566arrow-down119
arrow-up1547arrow-down1imageno.. just nolemmy.casunnie@lemmy.ca to Programmer Humor · 1 year agomessage-square95fedilink
minus-squarecmdrkeenlinkfedilinkarrow-up86arrow-down3·1 year agoHonestly not the worst thing I’ve seen.
minus-squarexmunk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down3·1 year agoI’d like you to think for a moment about CTEs, the HAVING clause, window functions and every other funky and useful thing you can do in SQL … Now just think, do you think that this syntax supports all those correctly?
minus-squarePrimarily0617@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up39arrow-down6·1 year agosql syntax doesn’t support even itself correctly i fail to see your point
minus-squarecmdrkeenlinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down1·1 year agoProbably no better or worse than any other ORM written in a more traditional language. Worst comes to worst, you can always escape to plain SQL.
Honestly not the worst thing I’ve seen.
I’d like you to think for a moment about CTEs, the HAVING clause, window functions and every other funky and useful thing you can do in SQL … Now just think, do you think that this syntax supports all those correctly?
sql syntax doesn’t support even itself correctly i fail to see your point
Probably no better or worse than any other ORM written in a more traditional language. Worst comes to worst, you can always escape to plain SQL.
deleted by creator