Article seems pretty flawed. Relevance is a vague metric, and the author relies pretty heavily on data related to government site visitation, which seems subject to bias toward certain types of users.

Market share is likely still incredibly low, but Firefox’s relevance should be spiking right now due to Google’s shenanigans with Chromium. The fact that like 90% of revenue for its for-profit wing is from Google is still troubling.

Any alternative views out there?

  • @onlinepersona
    link
    English
    4
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Firefox has been irrelevant for about a decade now. Most webdevs don’t even test for firefox anymore. Major websides actively ignore it and most users evidently either don’t know and/or use it.

    Yes, firefox is relevant as an alternative to Chromium-based browsers, but that’s about it. Mozilla has done a stellar job at keeping it irrelevant to keep bagging that sweet google money.

    Honestly, I hope firefox and mozilla die, to be reborn again by another entity, but Mitchell Baker probably will do their best to keep getting that sweet, sweet, Google money.

    CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      244 months ago

      With how google has been gong mask-off, I’d argue that FF has never been more relevant

      • @onlinepersona
        link
        English
        14 months ago

        It won’t change anything about Mozilla. They know they are the only viable option at the moment and they will milk it until they die. We should let it die.

        CC BY-NC-SA 4.0