• @rmam
    link
    1
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • @SpyrosM
      link
      61 year ago

      Well, for starters, WinUI 3 is Windows only (correct me if I’m wrong), while Avalonia supports Windows, MacOS, Linux, Android, iOS and WebAssembly.

      The cross-platform solution that Microsoft advocates for is MAUI, which doesn’t support Linux. And it uses native controls, meaning you may encounter platform-specific bugs, while Avalonia renders the controls the same way everywhere using Skia (same approach with Flutter).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      WinUI 3 is essentially boring. If you’re seeing any avalonia content, it’'s pretty much just community interest, because they have no marketing department that I know of. There’s just avaloniaui_mike who makes the occasional reddit post about some cool new thing they implemented.

      • @rmam
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Boring is subjective. I don’t find it interesting. I’ve never seen a dev who find it interesting beyond “oh uwp is dead, I guess I should port my app over”. It doesn’t bring anything particularly new to the table that I know of. If you think it does, I’m listening.

          I’m not sure what you mean by my yardstick here. I do find avalonia interesting.

          Also both of avalonia’s paid products are b2b and my proof is only anecdotal, but I find it unlikely you’ll see any paid advertising for it on reddit or threadiverse. That’s all.