• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    214 months ago

    Well “far cry fans” are wrong. Far cry 2 is probably the last mildly risky game Ubisoft ever produced and was way ahead of its time in a lot of aspects.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54 months ago

      Also far cry 1 was a completely different game and a decent shooter (for 2004). Definitely worth playing for the history.

    • @szczuroarturo
      link
      English
      34 months ago

      Yeach as far as climate goes it was great. The only unfortunate choice were the endlesly respawning guardpost (?) not sure about the name. But it was a massively ubfortunate point. It really made the game go from very good to throwing your controler in rage very fast.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        True, the hardest difficulties were actually very fun, but the respawning checkpoints kinda ruined them

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        Respectfully disagree. It’s the captured roadblocks that turn the late game of other far cry games boring. FC2 was constantly dangerous. Arriving at a mission start point was an adventure. You had the option to Leroy Jenkins into the roadblocks, beat a wide path around them, take the bus, or 30 other things in between.

        That’s why the later games make unlocked bases into fast travel points, because once defeated, there is no point in revisiting anything.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          You know what, when I played it I really hated these respawning roadblocks because I thought they were immersion breaking and “annoying”, but thinking about it, most of my better memories about random gunfights were around these roadblocks, so I agree with you, especially the late game thing.