This issue is already quite widely publicized and quite frankly “we’re handling it and removing this” is a much more harmful response than I would hope to see. Especially as the admins of that instance have not yet upgraded the frontend version to apply the urgent fix.

It’s not like this was a confidential bug fix, this is a zero day being actively exploited. Please be more cooperative and open regarding these issues in your own administration if you’re hosting an instance. 🙏

    • Zetaphor@zemmy.ccEnglish
      11·
      1 year ago

      Just because it’s not using your personal preference of containerization doesn’t qualify it as being “hacked together”. Docker is a perfectly acceptable solution for what Lemmy is.

    • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish
      101·
      1 year ago

      I will always espouse containers for critical workloads as they provide much better orchestration, especially during deployment. If your complaint is specifically against docker, I agree, we should be using k8s

        • andrew@lemmy.stuart.funOPEnglish
          131·
          1 year ago

          When someone says docker in the context of images today, they’re already talking about the OCI format.

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.netEnglish
          42·
          1 year ago

          OCI uses Dockerfiles and runs Docker images as docker images are just KVM image, which is what OCI runs. Nix is absolute overkill for the orchestration of a web server workload and would be better for managing the container host (whatever you’re running kubernetes or docker swarm on).

          I don’t really know how to put this, but nearly every single web service you encounter and interact with is built using a dockerfile just like how Lemmy is doing. If you’re going to disqualify Lemmy as a viable platform based on it having a dockerfile, I got bad news

          • towerfulEnglish
            21·
            1 year ago

            I thought KVM was virtualisation, as in separate kernels.
            And I thought containers shared the hosts kernel. Essentially an “overlay os”.

            So, a KVM could virtualise different hardware and CPU architectures.
            Whereas a container can only use what the host has

        • Kaizar@tezzo.f0rk.plEnglish
          11·
          1 year ago

          oof you sound exactly like some shit faced freshman who thinks he gained arcane knowledge, but in reality you don’t know shit nor have experience. Yeah, p sure you were that dude in the back of cybersec class.