This issue is already quite widely publicized and quite frankly “we’re handling it and removing this” is a much more harmful response than I would hope to see. Especially as the admins of that instance have not yet upgraded the frontend version to apply the urgent fix.

It’s not like this was a confidential bug fix, this is a zero day being actively exploited. Please be more cooperative and open regarding these issues in your own administration if you’re hosting an instance. 🙏

  • @demesisx
    link
    English
    -221 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      Just because it’s not using your personal preference of containerization doesn’t qualify it as being “hacked together”. Docker is a perfectly acceptable solution for what Lemmy is.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      I will always espouse containers for critical workloads as they provide much better orchestration, especially during deployment. If your complaint is specifically against docker, I agree, we should be using k8s

      • @demesisx
        link
        English
        -51 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • andrewOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 year ago

          When someone says docker in the context of images today, they’re already talking about the OCI format.

        • The Quuuuuill
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          OCI uses Dockerfiles and runs Docker images as docker images are just KVM image, which is what OCI runs. Nix is absolute overkill for the orchestration of a web server workload and would be better for managing the container host (whatever you’re running kubernetes or docker swarm on).

          I don’t really know how to put this, but nearly every single web service you encounter and interact with is built using a dockerfile just like how Lemmy is doing. If you’re going to disqualify Lemmy as a viable platform based on it having a dockerfile, I got bad news

          • @towerful
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            I thought KVM was virtualisation, as in separate kernels.
            And I thought containers shared the hosts kernel. Essentially an “overlay os”.

            So, a KVM could virtualise different hardware and CPU architectures.
            Whereas a container can only use what the host has

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          oof you sound exactly like some shit faced freshman who thinks he gained arcane knowledge, but in reality you don’t know shit nor have experience. Yeah, p sure you were that dude in the back of cybersec class.