gracicot to C++ · 1 year agoWhy does the compiler complain about a missing constructor when I'm just resizing my std::vector to a smaller size?devblogs.microsoft.comexternal-linkmessage-square3fedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down10
arrow-up18arrow-down1external-linkWhy does the compiler complain about a missing constructor when I'm just resizing my std::vector to a smaller size?devblogs.microsoft.comgracicot to C++ · 1 year agomessage-square3fedilink
minus-squareArkaniollinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoThank you. But why not just init the vector std::vector vect(56) And then resize 🧐
minus-squareKRAW@linux.communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThat vector constructor still requires a default constructor for the class of the object contained by the vector, so it’s the same issue but different context.
Thank you. But why not just init the vector std::vector vect(56) And then resize 🧐
That vector constructor still requires a default constructor for the class of the object contained by the vector, so it’s the same issue but different context.