Why does the compiler complain about a missing constructor when I'm just resizing my std::vector to a smaller size? - The Old New Thing
devblogs.microsoft.com
The compiler doesn't know that you're shrinking.
  • Arkaniol
    1·
    1 year ago

    Thank you. But why not just init the vector std::vector vect(56) And then resize 🧐

    • KRAW@linux.communityEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      That vector constructor still requires a default constructor for the class of the object contained by the vector, so it’s the same issue but different context.

    • gracicotOP
      1·
      1 year ago

      I saw the article on my mastodon feed. When it’s interesting I usually post it here