@[email protected] to ProgrammingEnglish • 2 months agoGoogle lays off staff from Flutter, Dart and Python teams weeks before its developer conference | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square101fedilinkarrow-up1323arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1323arrow-down1external-linkGoogle lays off staff from Flutter, Dart and Python teams weeks before its developer conference | TechCrunchtechcrunch.com@[email protected] to ProgrammingEnglish • 2 months agomessage-square101fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareCaptain AggravatedlinkfedilinkEnglish-3•2 months agoWhat idiot applies for a job at Google?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink26•edit-22 months agoSomeone who wants to have Google on their CV when they leave in 2 years. Generally works out.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•edit-22 months agoHow is idiot not immature name calling, but dumbass is?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•2 months agoSo if he phrased it as “The kind of person who would ask a question like this is a dumbass” not be immature name calling? Becuase that’d successfully not cross this weird line in the sand you’ve drawn
minus-square@refalolink0•2 months agoI think it would just be a subjective opinion at that point. And it’s not my line in the sand, but the actual definition: Name-calling is a form of argument in which insulting or demeaning labels are directed at an individual or group.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•2 months agoSomeone who wouldnt realise that that definition applies to both insults isnt the greatest at reading comprehension
What idiot applies for a job at Google?
Someone who wants to have Google on their CV when they leave in 2 years. Generally works out.
The kind that has bills to pay dumbass
no need for immature name-calling
How is idiot not immature name calling, but dumbass is?
Because it was not directed at a specific person.
So if he phrased it as “The kind of person who would ask a question like this is a dumbass” not be immature name calling? Becuase that’d successfully not cross this weird line in the sand you’ve drawn
I think it would just be a subjective opinion at that point.
And it’s not my line in the sand, but the actual definition:
Someone who wouldnt realise that that definition applies to both insults isnt the greatest at reading comprehension
Shut up loser