@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 month agoA strong hunchi.imgur.comimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1764arrow-down119
arrow-up1745arrow-down1imageA strong hunchi.imgur.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 month agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squareladlink2•1 month agoThey may have meant that “race card” is real and “victim cars” is not. But I still don’t think that is a valid point
minus-square@stemboltslink2•edit-21 month agoPossibly so. When they say the “first” I cannot tell if they mean the first one I mentioned or the first one they mentioned. Relative references in language is confusing!
minus-squareladlinkEnglish2•1 month agoTechnically, for referencing the previous parts there are “former” and “latter”, but you never know if it was not used intentionally or not.
They may have meant that “race card” is real and “victim cars” is not. But I still don’t think that is a valid point
Possibly so.
When they say the “first” I cannot tell if they mean the first one I mentioned or the first one they mentioned.
Relative references in language is confusing!
Technically, for referencing the previous parts there are “former” and “latter”, but you never know if it was not used intentionally or not.