There are so many flaws with this line of thinking which should be obvious to you, yet are not. I urge you to consider thinking this thought. Follow it to an actionable conclusion, then see how you feel about that conclusion. It may take you a few years so I wish you well on your journey.

I understand the assignment boss.

{I am mega sleepy so I’ll do some clean up edits on this tomorrow probably when my brain is working properly}

Tbh you never came off as ignorant, you seemed genuine and curious otherwise I would not have engaged. We are all ignorant of many things, it’s just a matter of how willing we are to fill that ignorance and how we react to discovering that ignorance.

Responding to another comment you made here.
I don’t really understand the emotional replies online either, everyone seems to be out to hurt others and I don’t understand it. It is so predictably vitriolic that I think that most of the rage is just bots arguing with bots to create the illusion of discord. Just a ‘hopeful’ conspiracy theory of mine… surely people aren’t so mean?

I misread your comment and said something stupid :)
Can’t seem to delete comments on Lemmy, so I replace them with a single period.
Apologies for the false alarm.

To restate the initial point being discussed, “Humans are sometimes neither male nor female.”

An anomaly differs from the common, as you state.

But in this discussion, we are talking about “the existence of something” and not “the normalcy of something”. Those are completely separate discussions.

No one is arguing that being born between genders is ‘normal’ or ‘common’, in fact, the abnormalcy of it is what allows those who carry prejudice and hate in their hearts to hurt and kill these people physically and legislatively.

In short, your comment presents no information relevant to the topic at hand.

I understand your sentiment and I dont want to come off as just “transbasher” […]

1. You seem to be genuinely open-minded, which is good of course. So as you have been well-spoken and generous of thought, I will attempt to be with you as well.

[…] because i have close both male and female friends who after college decided they wanted to transition.I don’t agree with their thought process but I don’t tell them or put them down for their choice because it’s their choice as an adult.

2. The concept of agreeing or disagreeing with someone’s lifestyle is foreign to me, so I cannot comment on that. I do not view myself as a judge to voice an opinion on any person’s lifestyle.

If I live in a society where I can use my sole judgement to manipulate the lifestyle of others, then that means that other members of that society can judge and manipulate my lifestyle. I do not want that for myself, so I do not wish it on others.

On the subject of intersex births, I find the 1 in 1700 to be very generous. Having a mother who has worked labor and delivery for the past 30 years in a large hospital, she has only ever had 2 instances where the baby was born intersex. And that’s out of tens of thousands of deliveries.

3. You must realize that you are taking two missteps of reason here.

The first is anecdotal thinking by placing personal experience above targeted and broad research, the world is a complex place and while I have no doubt that your mother presents this information in earnest, it remains an anecdote.

The second is hearsay, you are not only using anecdotal information, but second-hand anecdotal information.

In my view, one of these errors alone would be enough to disqualify the validity of your point, and together, well… I have no doubt that you are an intelligent person and I hope you can see my concern here, would it not bolster your views to step away from anecdote?

Regarding the data, I cannot comment on the data itself because I admit I am not an expert, I fetched the values from the best information from medical institutions I could find. If better data is presented, I will amend my comment now and moving forward.

In those fringe cases I think sure we can allow those to be allowed to transition because there is a biological reason evident from birth.

4. I agree.

But if you just have a hormone imbalance that doesn’t mean you need to block the natural course of growth to see “what you’d prefer”. Just let the body do it’s thing and when it’s done developing then mess around with it.

5. I disagree, I cannot imagine the pain that transgender folks experience because I am not gender dysphoric, but I do know what it feels like to have someone doubt my experience of mind. Having experienced [won’t go into detail for personal reasons] a variety of mental health issues in my life which have been discarded by others as false because… they were invisible… it is difficult to express the anger that this conjured within me at being told that my own experience was invalid because the observer had not personally experienced what I describe and therefore to them it was imaginary.

Whether you have experienced something like this specific example, or not, I believe that all humans have had the experience of being told that we are lying (when we are not) and we all know how bad that feels. What is real to a person is real to a person. Brains are not computers. We are not purely rational beings. I think that it is fair to allow a person to take any action which 1. increases their quality of life while 2. not harming others and in my view gender affirmation behaviors fall directly into this category.

6. (or 5a.) Regarding delaying treatment until full development. Many biological processes are not reversible, so allowing the body to “do what it will do” then address the results afterward introduces many complications.

Someone who doesn’t want to be a man might be pretty upset when biology makes them 6’8" (203cm) and 300lbs (136kg) then society says, “Okay you can try to be a girl now if you want.”

So I’m fine with this stance regarding reversible techniques (similar to how I feel about puberty blockers… kinda neat how my views are symmetric both ways, right? ;-) ) because there is no harm done. But forcing a delay to full development is something that I believe does cause harm.

Side note, often it can feel that taking no action is a safer action because of how our brains work. But as is often said, “Not making a decision, is a decision.” Taking no action can be equally harmful to taking an action. I believe that this thought applies to our current discussion.

Lucky for us, the arbitrarily set age of developement (roughly 15-18 depending on country) is well within the bounds of avoiding this scenario. That said, everyone develops at a different rate, and I think we all knew the 15 year old that was taller and broader than most full-grown men.

I hope that my comment reads well, I may add some small edits of clarification but I believe that I have expressed the general idea. Have a nice day.

.

1 in 1,700 people are born with both sexual organs.

If extrapolated to the population of the United States that is 10% of the population of Nebraska that cannot be defined in this manner.

Therefore, that statement is not biologically factual as thousands of people have both.

Since this is a UK forum, the UK has 40,000 citizens who cannot be defined male or female in this manner.

Onto your point about manipulating gender at a young age.

The largest number of gender reassignment surgeries are performed on the population I just described, without their consent, at birth. And believe it or not often doctors get it wrong.

Someone assigned female by a doctor as a baby, well turns out mentally they are a boy, a boy who had their penis removed at birth. That might have some affect on a person, I think you’d agree.

So with that in mind, I agree with you about one thing, that non-reversible gender decisions should not be made without the consent of the individual being assigned a gender, as doctors are currently doing to intersex babies on a regular basis.

So can we stop pretending that gender reassignement is the problem? It’s just a wedge issue designed and promoted to keep the lower classes divided so that we don’t realize what the rich are doing to us and this planet. I am not your enemy. We are allies. The enemy is up/down, not left/right.

Transgender people just want to exist. Is it an unreasonable demand to exist and be acknowledged? I think not.

I agree with some of these things.

CLI is the way.

Don’t rely on a black box, build a transparent box.

Left vs Right is a distraction.
The fight for a better life is Top vs Bottom.

Next time you take a break from licking the boot, read a history book. Do you know how many corpses are in the ground today because a few folks said, “We shouldn’t have to work seven days a week.” A fucking lot.

Thanks to them, we have the concept of “weekends”.

Change is written in blood.

This is not a one-off example, there are thousands.

That is reality. Welcome to it.

To be fair, a c level assassination is news, whereas a murder in a big city is not.

You state this as a norm, to me your perspective of this as an acceptable norm is the problem itself.

My thoughts :
Your post states authoritatively what the norm is. No challenge here, that is the norm. True.

but…
Why is that the accepted norm?

and…
What causes that to be the accepted norm?

so…
So if net worth affects the public services you receive in the form of police assistance, bounties, etc… isn’t that an indicator of a larger problem?

so…
Who benefits from the stated norms?

and…
Should we change those “norms”, kinda seems unfair huh?

Yes.

Not perfectly written, but I think you get my jist. I’m so tired of people stating the norms of society as if they are immutable truths and not symptoms of a broken system.

Have a nice day.

Yea dummy… that is the “reality” we want changed.
To you it’s immutable, to us it’s not.

The economy isn’t driven by the laws of the universe, it’s people, we can change it any time and have chosen not to. So now CEOs are dying.

Wanna change it now? No?
Alright cool. Maybe this is the new normal then.
People have a limit.

They’re being intentionally dense. But we understand your point. Some people were born to lick the boot. Let them stay dumb.

They indicate how much of an ass you come across as.

There are tons of people in this world who are right, yet everyone dislikes and doesn’t interact with. Something to think about some day, when you calm down.

You’re right. “Clearly” is relative to the effectiveness of your brain cells, I understand your particular frustration given what your brain cells have produced in this conversation.

It’s not even accurate, that’s what gets me. It’s just propaganda.
We have gynecologists. You just can’t kill unborn children. Gynecologists do a lot more than just abortions. Hell, only 14% of them performed abortions back in 2011, well before Roe vs Wade. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3170127/

(I sigh to myself, knowing that nothing I am about to write is going to get through, nonetheless…)

The joke is referencing the women who are presently dying to sepsis and other pregnancy related maladies in Texas, a red state.

When doctors are questioned about why they allowed it to happen, they cite the laws which impose $100,000 fines and 99 years in prison as reason for their inaction.

So yes, in theory you have doctors who service women, but in practice they are required by law to risk life in prison to do their job.

The obvious effect of this is a skill-drain where qualified members of that profession stop practicing in Texas and newly trained doctors practice elsewhere. This trend will become more visible as time goes on and more data is collected, not that data matters to this commenter…

So yes, you are correct that they can no longer kill unborn children, however if those unborn children grow up to be a woman it is perfectly legal to allow them to die while observing.

With the above information, even a below-averaged intelligence person could piece together the context you seem to be lacking, so I suppose that gives us some insight into your intelligence. (Just kidding, I’m just shitting on you because you are a callous non-empathetic asshole).

Your take is so dumb that I assume ChatGPT gave it to you and you re-posted it thinking to yourself, “Yeah, I showed those people!”, while not understanding anything you shared, the new age moron.

Tbh, I should consider migrating some of my one-liners to bash aliases. I just like to be cautious to not pollute my shell’s auto-complete.

The most useful bash trick for me is to save what I learn in demonstration scripts so I can $cat it later for a syntax reminder.

ex :
file named : ./follow_jellyfin_system_log

contents :
#!/bin/bash
journalclt -fe -u jellyfin

(some time later) … wtf args do i pass to journalctl again…

$ls ./script_parent_directory

(list of actions written in human language appear as file names)

$cat ./follow_jellyfin_system_log

me : “oh duh!”

rinse and repeat for every command or shortcut you learn, it forces you to convert the command into a short “noun_verb” format which to me is infinitely more understandable.

that’s my workflow. then the meta is deciding how to store your scripts so you don’t end up with a polluted home dir. godspeed fellow bashers.