• jlow (he/him)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -11 month ago

    Never thought about it that way, so if farmers (at this point probably mostly international big farming corporations) would just rotate their crops, they would not have to buy as much fertiliser, destroy the environment and probably a tonne of other disgusting stuff that comes with mono-cultures, like the excessive need for fertilisers? Yeah, that checks out 🥵 (“It’s too much work! Other crops don’t sell!”)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      201 month ago

      would just

      Farmers have been rotating crops for hundreds of years man. Corporate farms rotate crops too. Step down off that soapbox for a moment.

      The whole joke is that the person in the image would have made fun of the idea in ancient times, killing the food supply of early civilization and setting us all back by thousands of years.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 month ago

        Yeah, the point of the joke is that crop rotation has been practiced for literally thousands of years. It was an agricultural invention which gave ancient cultures significantly higher crop yields, enabling a huge number of societal, cultural and scientific developments. The joke is based on the idea that before crop rotation was discovered, some people might have considered it a silly idea, delaying the developments enabled by the significantly increased crop yields.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 month ago

      They do rotate, for example soybean -> corn because soybeans add nitrogen to the ground which corn needs a lot of

    • Deebster
      link
      English
      31 month ago

      Also mixing crops (or non-farmable plants) has big benefits, but it’s currently cheaper to use chemically-derived fertilisers and go the monoculture route.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      If only a government could artificially change the artificial incentives, without worrying about the votes they get from the minority who farm and are citizens.