Picture of Skinner from “The Simpsons” with the linux logo on his face and the word “Pathetic” in the bottom center of the picture.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      322·
      9 months ago

      Hardly, NixOS documentation is trash. The Arch Wiki is essentially the platonic ideal of documentation.

    • CodeGameEat@lemmy.worldEnglish
      347·
      9 months ago

      The difference is I can upgrade my NixOS without breaking everything hahaha. But it has gotten a lot more popular recently, which I think is your analogy? Or because people always bring it up now lol

          • expr
            6·
            9 months ago

            The similarities are superficial at best. The only thing similar is that it uses braces for attribute sets (objects) and square brackets for lists. And I guess quotes for strings.

            But otherwise it’s a full (functional) programming language, with functions, variable bindings, etc.

            Flakes aren’t perfect, but they are really good for ensuring that you have completely reproducible builds since the version used for every dependency is pinned.

          • Shareni
            4·
            9 months ago

            • control the versions of the repo and packages

            • config the official repo (allow unfree packages for example) that doesn’t work unless you’re on nixos

            • add packages from a git repo

            • update package definitions (think apt update)

          • Vuraniute@thelemmy.club
            1·
            9 months ago

            iirc theyre meant to improve reproducibility by using pinned versions of stuff like nixpkgs instead of inheriting from your system which could be a problem if for example someone on 23.11 sends a deriv to someone on 24.05

        • starmanEnglish
          9·
          9 months ago

          If only wiki was as good as Arch’s…

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      826·
      9 months ago

      Nah, NixOS has a very deserved air of superiority. Arch just fakes its one.