• mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Quick outline of why TikTok is so uniquely dangerous:

    1. The Chinese government treats communication networks as their personal hoovering-attachment for any data they might want. Companies are required by law to operate as an arm of Chinese intelligence, both in terms of giving information and in terms of manipulating what information people on their network are allowed to see.
    2. It’s not just your TikTok data. It’s photos and files on your phone, your contacts, your messages, basically anything that the app with its too-permissive permissions can get its hands on, can potentially go up to Chinese intelligence.
    3. TikTok is not structured like any other app. It has features like custom-downloading and running arbitrary binaries from its central server that honestly don’t even make much sense except as spying apparatus (consistent with #1).
    4. What China might do with this unprecedented level of access to everyone’s phones is malevolent in a different way than, say, Facebook’s access to everyone’s data. Like Facebook they have the ability to e.g. influence an election, but they also have the ability to try to blackmail an individual to compromise them, or do for-real torture in the real world (say by tracking down a dissident via TikTok spying and then having one of their little Chinese-police-in-America units grab them).

    Basically I don’t think any government should have that kind of access to access people’s private communications or design the algorithms that dictate people’s social media experience, but definitely not China’s in particular.

    • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      They can’t control it. Simple as. Everyone talking about spying is silly if they think that would change under a different ownership. Spying is going to happen either way, I’ll take the spy that can do less to me.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, I support banning it but the whole “either sell it or get banned” does have me wondering if they are doing the right thing for the wrong reason here. Or even the wrong thing for the wrong reason, if they intend to just keep it going under new management that isn’t the CCP.

  • Binzy_Boi@supermeter.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Still with this? Is there anything that they’re doing differently from other social media corps based in the US? The user data gets sold regardless.

    • FoxBJK@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      The thing they’re doing differently is being owned by a Chinese company. If TikTok was simply a US based social media corp, no one would care.

      • Heavybell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not like everyone is happy about the US doing this, but at least the US is theoretically our ally…

    • ClydapusGotwald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      The difference is china = bad. They don’t give a rats ass if a company in America sells your data cause that’s cool.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yea, they’re struggling to get their suicide numbers up as high as Instagram. America demands nothing short of the best so we take deep pride in Zuckerberg’s accomplishment

  • anticurrent@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I really hope that ban will take effect before the elections, then you will see both parties scrambling to retract the legislation after enormous backlash.

    • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I feel like the Democratic party is the only one who will feel backlash from this, the typical TikTok-er doesn’t lean Republican I don’t think (well, other than creepy old dudes who get way too into videos of teenage girls dancing)

  • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    10 months ago

    Fuck the US government telling me what I can and can’t do fucking online. Great firewall of America bullshit.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah so that logic only works if people make informed decisions and they don’t, that’s why society the size it is at the moment only works with a government in place setting some ground rules and preventing people from being morons… Our trying to anyway.

      Also, the internet is not hosted in international water as far as I know so there’s no reasons it can’t be regulated… Hell, I’m sure you’re very happy (or hope that you are) that CSAM isn’t just everywhere in the name of net neutrality and letting people do what they want on it.

      • DrDeadCrash
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        And who decides what gets censored? Today it’s tick tok tomorrow it’s Lemmy?

        • ButtCheekOnAStick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Lemmy is not a United States adversary with a history of spying on foreign intelligence. If it was, I sure as fuck wouldn’t be on it!

          • DrDeadCrash
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            What if the government decided Lemmy was a dangerous (communist ?) platform that needs to be shutdown? This is a matter of censorship, however the outright open market for our data from all platforms is the elephant in the room here.

            • ButtCheekOnAStick@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Well, I would expect there to be some shred of evidence that it is dangerous to the security of the United States. We have LOADS of evidence of that for TikTok.

              • DrDeadCrash
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                And if no one cares about your expectations because now it’s been done before so if it’s being done again it must be for good reason?

              • Nix@merv.news
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                An american company that sells data to foreign intelligence so they can manipulate the public. Facebook is a way bigger threat to peoples freedom than TikTok but the CCP boogeyman has y’all in a chokehold so you’re distracted from the real threat

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s how society works in general and I don’t understand how people think letting the internet be free of laws wouldn’t lead to shit.

          • whalebiologist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I experimented with tor and signal at some point and it was enlightening to see how much of “the internet” as we think we know it is already heavily filtered and served to us through a very narrow pipeline of modern browsers.