• taladar@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Why though? There are more than enough people on this planet. Delaying the failure of pension systems for a few more decades is not a sufficient reason to screw over all of humanity.

          • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            8 months ago

            But why prevent births in France while emerging/ developing countries are spawning armies of babies -maybe under their own policies? Don’t we want to have some births in western / rich countries as well? We’re already below replacement rate if I’m not mistaken…

            • taladar@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              8 months ago

              The main reason poor and developing countries have high birth rates is that their rate of child mortality is higher and that they have no social systems to take care of the elderly so having many children is sort of their pension system. If anything we want to introduce measures there that make the high birth rates unnecessary.

              Also, why would we want to make the problem worse by having births here in addition to theirs? Assuming you don’t mean the obvious racist or nationalist motivations?

              • Flughoernchen@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                8 months ago

                Also, this commenter escalated “not pushing rates” to “preventing” pretty quickly. Noone is keeping you from getting children, mate. It’s a personal choice that should neither be prohibited nor rewarded.

              • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                8 months ago

                It seems though that our pension system is failing, as you pointed out yourself. So maybe having a stable number of children is the better pension system?

                Given the productivity rate that we have in industrialized countries, we don’t need 5 children per mother, but 2 seem reasonable. And there isn’t “more than enough” people. Any number of “enough” is arbitrary, until the planetary limits are exceeded from the number of people. But we could easily sustain another 2-4 billion more people with a good life, if we would get rid of capitalism.

                • cinnamonTea@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Sure, but how likely is that? Shouldn’t we start on filling the planet up to that limit only once we have a better system, not now?

                  We could also stabilise pension systems by allowing in immigrants to work the jobs that aren’t getting done tight now. Skilled craftspeople are needed, and if they help us with pensions and get a better life for their families out of it, even better, right?

              • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                8 months ago

                I like diversity… and I wish my culture survives, same as the others.

                I believe you’re wrong on the rest: by having birth rates that exceeds the infancy mortality rate they are still largely growing in absolute numbers. Just check the numbers; there’s growth. Likely they would grow further without the sad and unfortunate mortality rate but still.

      • DieguiTux8623@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        They will need the remaining three days to go to war, considering their president’s recent declarations!

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          France finally starting to take the Ukraine situation a bit more seriously is a good thing. Something we should be glad about, even if the statements were a bit vague.

          And people in France aren’t going to be conscripted into fighting in Ukraine. Stop this nonsense.

  • thesmokingman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 months ago

    Note that this is four ten-hour days, not a reduction in working.

  • Titou@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Divorced parents in France with shared custody will be granted the right to work four days per week under a trial scheme to be tested this year.

    “Divorced” which mean if it’s just “Separated” like most of the time, it’s fcked.