• sirsquid@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I tried to figure out a funny reply to this, but it’s already too funny. Well played.

  • onlinepersona
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Just like Apple and Google with their appstores. They claim to have proprietary stores because it’s safer, but don’t actually do the legwork to back that up.

    CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Is it just me, or is this happening more on the snap store than on Flathub? Or is it just down to reporting.

    Seems weird considering there’s, at least on paper, more checks on uploads to the Snap store than to FlatHub (although their checks are evidently not very comprehensive!)

    I’m not going to shit on Canonical too much (for once) here, because any app distribution platform with a low barrier to entry will invariably get bad actors trying to abuse it from time to time — we see it even on much more locked-down and better funded app stores, like Apple’s App Store and on Google Play.

    This will be a growing problem for both Snap and FlatHub. Moderating them will take resources, and there’s already a shortage of that in the FOSS world.