• Rikj000
    link
    fedilink
    English
    876 months ago

    Relic Castle,
    is the site name that got DMCAd by Nintendont.

    Saves you from opening the article.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      156 months ago

      Thank you. Iirc, they were the main hub for the pokemon in rpgmaker frameworks, and for all the games based off of that. Shame.

  • DosDude👾
    link
    fedilink
    806 months ago

    Nintendo is on their way of becoming one of the worst companies of the year for the fans. Fucking hell…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      816 months ago

      This is not even remotely new for Nintendo, and is exactly how they have always reacted to fan games 🤷‍♂️

      • SteefLem
        link
        fedilink
        43
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I saw a docu i think about smash bros. from nintendo, very cool docu serie btw, and the guys that organized the first tournaments got a letter or something that they where not allowed to organize such tournaments (mind you just fans playing the game in a bigger room nothing more) because, and here it comes, the game should not be played like that! Wtf.

        (Ah yes The Smash Brothers 2013)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          406 months ago

          It’d honestly be hilarious if all the creators just started rebranding their fan projects with Palworld Pals (or any other similar IP). Start shifting the discourse away from Pokemon. I’d love that.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          146 months ago

          it makes it more ridiculous that people who don’t like this kind of behavior support nintendo at all.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            136 months ago

            Exactly. I’m proudly 3 years Nintendo-free, and I don’t see myself going back anytime soon.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              86 months ago

              Once my Switch broke and the Steam Deck released, I decided I didn’t want to bother with Nintendo anymore. They’ve been killing their communities for far too long.

    • reric88🧩
      link
      fedilink
      26 months ago

      Nintendo has kind of always sucked as far as passionate fans are concerned. Their products are some of the best out there, sure, but they are ruthless.

      Playing devil’s advocate, they’re just protecting their IP. Problem is they can’t spend resources or time figuring out who is or is not profiting from their work, so they just stamp out all the bugs in the house that get big enough to be noticed. I guess, I really don’t know.

    • @UndercoverUlrikHD
      link
      26 months ago

      It’s the highest grossing media franchise of all time, what sort of question is this?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        76 months ago

        this is what baffles me. its already a huge hit, why bully fans for even more money?

        im sure a big part of this success comes from fans doing things like that for free out of sheer passion for it, and nintendo just comes along to stop it…

      • Ephera
        link
        fedilink
        66 months ago

        It’s called a “rhetorical question”. Glad to be of help.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        At this point it’s like Disney aggressively taking down anyone who talks about marvel in a public online space. Like, okay then, guess I’ll get another interest i am allowed to be a fan of.

  • @[email protected]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    66 months ago

    I’ve not really thought about it before, but how does a dmca takedown work? Is it just the company telling the hosting to get rid of it and they comply? What is to keep someone from self hosting or hosting somewhere hard to do anything about?

    • Muddybulldog
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Once the alleged infringing content is removed, the infringing party has the option to file a Counter Claim in response, stating under penalty of perjury that the DMCA Notice is false. The OSP/ISP must wait 10-14 days after receiving a valid DMCA Counter Claim before reactivating or allowing access to the claimed infringing content. The claimant who filed the DMCA Takedown Notice must then file a court order against the infringing site owner and the OSP/ISP if they wish to keep the infringing content offline.

      Self-hosters are also subject to DMCA. Failure to comply runs the risk of being sued.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        Self-hosters are also subject to DMCA. Failure to comply runs the risk of being sued.

        Not if the self-hoster is self-hosting out of DMCA jurisdiction. Also, not if the self-hoster can not be found (say, redirect your mailer to /dev/null).